Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5C77934E for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30349 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2012 13:20:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30289 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2012 13:20:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30281 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2012 13:20:56 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:20:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username bdelacretaz, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:20:56 +0000 Received: by eaal10 with SMTP id l10so1479136eaa.6 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:20:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.48.7 with SMTP id u7mr5134372eeb.89.1329139254516; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:20:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.29.75 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:20:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F390C74.4010302@leichtgewicht.at> References: <4F37631E.2010801@leichtgewicht.at> <4F38EF17.2010904@leichtgewicht.at> <4F390C74.4010302@leichtgewicht.at> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:20:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Working groups - different approach From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Martin Heidegger wro= te: > On 13/02/2012 21:56, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> >> the one I posted to previously, at >> http://grep.codeconsult.ch/2011/12/06/stefanos-mazzocchis-busy-list-patt= ern/ >> (it's my blog - as I said, shameless but IMO useful plug) > > I can only find information about the proper use =C2=A0of the list not ab= out > proper management... Ah ok, sorry about that - by "management" I meant using precise Subject lines, [tags], one topic per thread etc. >> >> The best is to reach consensus without a vote, people agree and commit >> code (or translations, whatever) that they find good. >> > > I found it difficult to judge the point when a consensus without a vote h= as > been reached... You can use lazy consensus if unsure, use [lazy] in the subject line and say something like "I'll do that unless someone opposes within 24 hours". > ...One question still: What about different languages: Japanese/Chinese/F= rench > etc. how does a integration of people with other language-skills usually > work?... If people can communicate in english that can happen here (at least initially), otherwise I agree that you'd need separate lists. Note that the http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/ probably has similar issues w.r.t translation, you might want to talk to them. -Bertrand