Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F169C9B9C for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:15:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65532 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2012 09:15:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65502 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2012 09:15:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65494 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2012 09:15:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:15:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:15:46 +0000 Received: by mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com with SMTP id x4so2918577obh.6 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:15:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gNNzlddMjp04p5UBnYmD3w6xdLfbxDDEMVpJl5iA54M=; b=tJnSCKOcaIknM5Jf2O3yK6iXnil+EA4ZAvSfneLzz2fy7Mx0lJrPRyIvQaEUjA8GwE pmswmA0evtVJ+gQBMlajJIYTXcVup9cKr+LVGj2bI6TipoGD+GubZV79R/gnFnRFozHy ceXS/OLyPc+Ug5aFBv4/gfS5e61gYoG/uvxjc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.0.106 with SMTP id 10mr1239267obd.72.1329383726474; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:15:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.231.72 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:15:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <435062CE-006D-4E52-B4B8-F9F68E1F3E37@classsoftware.com> References: <1329381498.4139.10.camel@lapsang> <435062CE-006D-4E52-B4B8-F9F68E1F3E37@classsoftware.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 01:15:26 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: asdoc comments for flash player and SDK version numbers From: Omar Gonzalez To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c077ec9641604b9114459 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043c077ec9641604b9114459 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Perhaps a script to strip out all comments and a way to create patches > ignoring missing comments would be useful? > > Thanks, > Justin I'm not quire sure what you mean. The ideal solution would be to figure out a way to keep comments in such a way that the during development they're not in our files but at release or at patch submission the proper documentation is there. -- Omar Gonzalez s9tpepper@apache.org --f46d043c077ec9641604b9114459--