Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ADFAC08B-48FE-4EAD-84A4-3FA39BCAEBF0@realeyes.com>
References: <d5234720-14d0-4c9a-a9cd-98649329522b@blur>
	<7cebf2a6-85dc-49ae-b589-4cab43be5af0@blur>
	<4F392A83.9020802@leichtgewicht.at>
	<CAAgciqot_6VSVnUusZCVw75XPtF2O_L9=rPOMmttbCUu6R+gQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<01d101ccea66$62dce7f0$2896b7d0$@davidarno.org>
	<4F39312D.6030300@leichtgewicht.at>
	<01dc01ccea68$0cf3e2b0$26dba810$@davidarno.org>
	<CAH=GR+EpvQPC8S=Rde_f7bSydN8OVRkmwrfuafcxteQ3KKdskg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH=GR+HU4=6hJkN_vK0A7mJAhtq=Pd8jWLbLVp0kFwm5enwMsg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEFz_vtS2WUusTmad-WEXS61YbP1hHqCx1S==Z7FZ84yy=Xv3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<ADFAC08B-48FE-4EAD-84A4-3FA39BCAEBF0@realeyes.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:36:41 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAEFz_vuiOazaJ+JoKBDPOghFg+HiB1b6mb+PST67uvc4xMMNNw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DECISION] Unit Testing and Mocking Frameworks
From: Omar Gonzalez <omarg.developer@gmail.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0435c20a31210804b926857f

--f46d0435c20a31210804b926857f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Friday, February 17, 2012, Jun Heider wrote:

>
> On Feb 16, 2012, at 12:39 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
>
> > I'm not really seeing any opposition to FlexUnit and Mockolate as the
> unit
> > testing and mocking libraries we should adopt. Unless I get some
> objections
> > before EOD tomorrow I'm going to assume we've reached a consensus on this
> > and add some verbiage to the project site to communicate which libraries
> > we'll be working with for unit testing the framework.
> >
> > --
> > Omar Gonzalez
> > s9tpepper@apache.org <javascript:;>
>
> Hi Omar, sorry for the late response. In addition to this post I also saw
> some conversation on some commits from you regarding this verbiage.
>
> Two reasons for my tardiness:
>
> 1. Been swamped with tons of client work lately.
>
> 2. This was marked as [DECISION]. Seeing this post makes me wonder, can we
> here at Apache Flex adopt something holistically without a [VOTE] thread?
> To be quite honest this mailing list is so busy that when I get busy as in
> #1 above, I have a tendency to skim my inbox for threads marked with [VOTE].
>
> That being said, I'm personally not contesting FlexUnit and Mockolate, but
> on the other hand can we realistically say that something has been adopted
> into the project without a proper [VOTE] thread?
>
> Maybe one of the mentors can set me straight?


The short answer is yes.

Unless there are objections if there is a "lazy consensus" reached there is
no need to [VOTE] on everything, we'd never get anything done that way I
imagine. You can read more on the decision making process here:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html

-omar

--f46d0435c20a31210804b926857f--