Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B530499E4 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38223 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2012 10:58:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38158 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2012 10:58:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38149 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2012 10:58:58 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:58:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.41] (HELO mail-ww0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:58:51 +0000 Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so5645879wgb.0 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:58:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 10.180.14.73 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.14.73; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 10.180.14.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=omarg.developer@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=omarg.developer@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.14.73]) by 10.180.14.73 with SMTP id n9mr34353981wic.16.1329908310677 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:58:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7P5VFh2pAYSGqmMR9ZjstHkfWHrTZt6frQoBbdgyR3s=; b=szlpHH3pqZ+Gzff1a5qs2r5f2XpB79YrWNor3eB5DJV7xnfBUBp6zqwta5FY0SK+sj 6CgOgpMzyAon3hzcdK01KXDfBsPI0eP7lqWW1ggJGvZeyLxD7Wc5WXgVF4AsJPFEB3Sk Iv0jhCCbr5GgKRkKkvwicEquc0bekRLkS10Es= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.14.73 with SMTP id n9mr28401467wic.16.1329908310439; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:58:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.162.14 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:58:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <73EAD4BA8D3A4DBB98C28857CB669C70@KORODESKTOP> <4F44C7E7.1020008@leichtgewicht.at> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:58:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adobe might think of open-sourcing the Design View if there is sufficient interest From: Omar Gonzalez To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04138cbb6d782104b98b6870 --f46d04138cbb6d782104b98b6870 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Pepe wrote: > Why does not Adobe contribute Flash Builder to Eclipse Foundation? > # Then it might support 64bit and Eclipse plug-in. > > Shigeru Nakagaki > Simply because that wouldn't make them money. And Adobe is about making money. But, let's stay on topic, this mailing list is for Apache Flex and we can't really speak for Adobe and speculating is not beneficial to the purpose of this mailing list. -- Omar Gonzalez s9tpepper@apache.org Apache Flex PPMC Member --f46d04138cbb6d782104b98b6870--