Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D7159BB1 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47214 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2012 10:41:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47178 invoked by uid 500); 17 Feb 2012 10:41:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 47169 invoked by uid 99); 17 Feb 2012 10:41:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:41:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.175] (HELO mail-wi0-f175.google.com) (209.85.212.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:41:41 +0000 Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so1517199wib.6 for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:41:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lt1N5/F4beMMSV4NaJYBWNwU1EBJiY8vcKaZeZAwJ9I=; b=SvOpzQfdzFl1fIF9CVEVinE4xsjjSqSjcLCN3l0zizHHTG9wmGUZDGegg4LlzldLms x0sAK3Lwy1M1J3GiBB2GNvoLSU0Wx+xC1kqf7nJHhEmyY1U7XTMe9eHI/wX6DYXf4ejA GoC2IkaT/woKBcss75G+Xtcel5DN8l3T9MHi4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.90.212 with SMTP id by20mr2703185wib.12.1329475281455; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:41:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.8.138 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:41:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <7cebf2a6-85dc-49ae-b589-4cab43be5af0@blur> <4F392A83.9020802@leichtgewicht.at> <01d101ccea66$62dce7f0$2896b7d0$@davidarno.org> <4F39312D.6030300@leichtgewicht.at> <01dc01ccea68$0cf3e2b0$26dba810$@davidarno.org> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 02:41:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DECISION] Unit Testing and Mocking Frameworks From: Omar Gonzalez To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be256e38a7204b9269523 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d043be256e38a7204b9269523 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Friday, February 17, 2012, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Jun Heider > > wrote: > > ...can we realistically say that something has been adopted into the > project > > without a proper [VOTE] thread? > > > > Maybe one of the mentors can set me straight?.. > > The final rule IMO is that decisions must be made by consensus. > > A [VOTE] is definitely consensus, if someone misses that it's their > problem. > > Any other form of consensus can be challenged, because it's too easy > to miss on a busy list. > > I've just added a note to > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Getting+Started about > [DECISION] which is confusing, will discuss in a separate thread. > > BTW, in my opinion there's not much benefit in deciding for one test > framework or another until there are *actual tests in svn* that people > can use to make an opinion. Code speaks louder than words. > > -Bertrand > Here's a link: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/flex/whiteboard/s9tpepper/validators/src-tests/org/apache/flex/validators/StringValidatorTests.as?revision=1237166&view=markup -omar --f46d043be256e38a7204b9269523--