Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates
 10.180.101.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.101.37;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <08f601ccf09b$e2f5d2e0$a8e178a0$@rduartes.net>
References: <08f601ccf09b$e2f5d2e0$a8e178a0$@rduartes.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 05:30:04 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAEFz_vsGDy8w+OnnWk0+_JBnrWVR8FN7rDUVUqoeRL4_xFiWGA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Changed the wiki to reflect the status of the imported code
From: Omar Gonzalez <omarg.developer@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428158a516c704b97968db

--f46d04428158a516c704b97968db
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Rui Silva <flex@rduartes.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> Just changed the getting started wiki page in order to reflect the fact
> that
> the source code has already been imported to trunk. Also removed the
> reference to the framework in the whiteboard area. Actually, now that we
> have the source code in the trunk does it still make sense to keep the
> other
> copy in the whiteboard?
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Rui
>
> My knee jerk reaction is to say no, we should kill it from there and only
have branches of things in our own areas (whiteboard/s9tpepper/frameworks
for example) if we're developing a bug fix/addition.

But, I'm not sure how the code in whiteboard/frameworks compares to the
trunk/frameworks. I can do a diff later tonight and see what/if there are
major differences. I imagine Carol will probably give us some insight into
that before then, but if not I'll try to run the diff tonight if someone
hasn't beat me to it.

--
Omar Gonzalez
s9tpepper@apache.org

--f46d04428158a516c704b97968db--