Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FD2B950E for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2012 20:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70150 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2012 20:10:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70037 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2012 20:10:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70029 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2012 20:10:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:10:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.237.132.80] (HELO wp073.webpack.hosteurope.de) (80.237.132.80) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:10:03 +0000 Received: from p4aa831.osaknt01.ap.so-net.ne.jp ([120.74.168.49] helo=[192.168.1.21]); authenticated by wp073.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1RuUsf-0000oV-0m; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:09:41 +0100 Message-ID: <4F30337E.9020803@leichtgewicht.at> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:09:34 +0900 From: Martin Heidegger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Starting with the Whiteboard Code References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;mh@leichtgewicht.at;1328559003;0846bcb6; On 07/02/2012 04:52, Carol Frampton wrote: > Many, but not all, do screen compares Are the other ones logical tests? In other words: Would they need to be ported to a unit-test system? yours Martin.