Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A82C8966E for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 22:35:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75999 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2012 22:35:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75959 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2012 22:35:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75949 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2012 22:35:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 22:35:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 22:35:31 +0000 Received: by pbcum15 with SMTP id um15so216957pbc.6 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:35:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of justin@classsoftware.com designates 10.68.223.41 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.223.41; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of justin@classsoftware.com designates 10.68.223.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=justin@classsoftware.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.223.41]) by 10.68.223.41 with SMTP id qr9mr44839215pbc.154.1329690908852 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:35:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.223.41 with SMTP id qr9mr37641728pbc.154.1329690908814; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:35:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (124-169-17-188.dyn.iinet.net.au. [124.169.17.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h6sm23024908pbg.5.2012.02.19.14.35.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 14:35:08 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: Re: [gosh] Goshhawk language choices and more [Was: Adobe / Apache / Spoon Flex Tour] From: Justin Mclean In-Reply-To: <1329690433.3272.67.camel@lapsang> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:35:02 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <26362589-4E47-49D0-9E93-16E763E97728@classsoftware.com> References: <1329687982.3272.39.camel@lapsang> <1329690433.3272.67.camel@lapsang> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn46y6XgMlrLIU5Y+8z3UkcARnPq6QwNfMeMiazy+9PaYgH3Na5u745NP3UfiqfGI6+tH1N X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, > Therefore I think with Flex our only choice is to do the complete > opposite of haXe and to write JavaScript-specific renderers to replace > all the skin classes in Flex. That is the only way we can hope to get > good performance. Does anyone know what approach FalconJS is taking? Would be useful to know. Justin