Return-Path: 
 <flex-dev-return-3922-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2777A9677
	for <apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Sat,  4 Feb 2012 20:52:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 79480 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2012 20:52:43 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 79397 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2012 20:52:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:flex-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <flex-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 79381 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2012 20:52:43 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:52:42 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 david@davidarno.org does not designate 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:52:33 +0000
Received: by werc1 with SMTP id c1so3929669wer.6
        for <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.138.24 with SMTP id z24mr1132350wei.48.1328388733016;
        Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kindred (188-220-92-24.zone11.bethere.co.uk. [188.220.92.24])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p10sm15281224wic.0.2012.02.04.12.52.12
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:52:12 -0800 (PST)
From: "David Arno" <david@davidarno.org>
To: <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [Discussion] Flex 5 and non-SWF targets: Skinning
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 20:52:11 -0000
Message-ID: <03f401cce37e$de63d210$9b2b7630$@davidarno.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AczjfhrrheXvJXr6SlaTc1dN0lGZdA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQnOATtjnTr2YxebSMwjFrNMvjpVkE7WQ03rWAQ1OJpLdQml2es8VwnPCPZiAa9z9swRbEe8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

<tumbleweed/>

There has been zero responses to this technical email on how we might
progress Flex in the past 24 hours. Discussions on the minutia of logos
would have got 10s of response in that time. This worries me. It's great
that we have an audience ready to whoop at pretty pictures, but does this
list actually have the technical skills to really take over the development
of Flex?

David.