Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78FBB96E3 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12270 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2012 10:52:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12243 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2012 10:52:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12235 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2012 10:52:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:52:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of david@davidarno.org does not designate 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.175] (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:52:04 +0000 Received: by eaal10 with SMTP id l10so2566636eaa.6 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:51:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of david@davidarno.org designates 10.14.22.16 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.14.22.16; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of david@davidarno.org designates 10.14.22.16 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=david@davidarno.org Received: from mr.google.com ([10.14.22.16]) by 10.14.22.16 with SMTP id s16mr15059306ees.2.1329907902928 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:51:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.22.16 with SMTP id s16mr12047620ees.2.1329907902698; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:51:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from wraith64 ([212.32.42.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v51sm101362531eef.2.2012.02.22.02.51.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:51:41 -0800 (PST) From: "David Arno" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: ActionScript workers will come in the second half of 2012 with Flash Player "Dolores" Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:53:27 -0000 Message-ID: <00f901ccf150$3581abb0$a0850310$@davidarno.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQKMawZ0zLVMMAWSe4aGi851LClhzpTJyULg Content-Language: en-gb X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnjvyRWjS8E1JK7J77tYGfTgERtgQKUKB9fFYaYldnWry41fXFYKoxibLDd9ej9Hy72ee/b > From: Pepe [mailto:pepe.fxug@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 February 2012 10:41 > > This is very good news and I'm concerning about the following two things. > > 1. New Flex Framework should support ActionScript workers as a part of framework. > > 2. The AIR framework in Flex Framework should be re-designed with ActionScript workers. > > Please add these features to Apache Flex roadmap. Sorry Shigeru, but Apache doesn't work like that. There is no roadmap. If you'd like to grab yourself a copy of the code, discuss your plans here, canvas for assistance, and then help write a new framework that makes use of worker threads, then great. I'm sure many would be more than willing to help you. If the result is good enough, it'll form part of a future release. David.