Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D46FB95E3 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:18:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22266 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2012 09:18:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22232 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2012 09:18:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22223 invoked by uid 99); 22 Feb 2012 09:18:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:18:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of david@davidarno.org does not designate 74.125.83.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.47] (HELO mail-ee0-f47.google.com) (74.125.83.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:18:45 +0000 Received: by eekd41 with SMTP id d41so2601669eek.6 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:18:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of david@davidarno.org designates 10.14.181.193 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.14.181.193; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of david@davidarno.org designates 10.14.181.193 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=david@davidarno.org Received: from mr.google.com ([10.14.181.193]) by 10.14.181.193 with SMTP id l41mr15208371eem.26.1329902304239 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:18:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.181.193 with SMTP id l41mr12157205eem.26.1329902304087; Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:18:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from wraith64 ([212.32.42.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o49sm100512806eeb.7.2012.02.22.01.18.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:18:22 -0800 (PST) From: "David Arno" To: References: <4F44A4AE.1030408@leichtgewicht.at> <4F44AFAB.9060002@leichtgewicht.at> <33487595652B444690C75E0151928A4B@KORODESKTOP> In-Reply-To: <33487595652B444690C75E0151928A4B@KORODESKTOP> Subject: RE: [OT] Flash Platform roadmap Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:20:08 -0000 Message-ID: <009001ccf143$2c353890$849fa9b0$@davidarno.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQFvUe/6TUUAIpgnLQb2iVvJu82qKwMcTVtyAc9nS/4BUEs5cgGMSr07lsWejrA= Content-Language: en-gb X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbxEuOmiWY/wvAv5umjCv55oYCpLs0LtCwfBxoZrcIyOqQcE8uJCEesdjp3puP8z1xfIZq > From: Dimitri k. [mailto:koro@noos.fr] > Sent: 22 February 2012 09:08 > > No he was referring that future Flash Player linux version will be only available in Google Chrome. I can't decide if that is right or not. As the Pepper API is described as "cross-platform API for plugins for web browsers," that implies that other browsers could implement it too. If it is cross-platform though, why is Adobe ditching direct support for Flash for Linux only? Sadly, it is another nail in the coffin of Flex as a Flash-based technology, no matter how one looks at it. David.