incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Duane Nickull <du...@uberity.com>
Subject Re: SEO for SWF Was: Flash Platform roadmap
Date Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:32:05 GMT
It is a very valuable discussion to have.  I am just not sure if it
belongs in the Compiler list.

FWIW - I used XHTML data providers.  Having the keyword in <title> for a
better initial ranking.

BTW - I will be in Vienna next week if you want to grab a beer to discuss?

Duane
________________________________________

Überity.com
President & COO
Adobe LiveCycle ES Consultant Services
http://www.uberity.com
Blog | http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Twitter | @Uberity @duanechaos





On 12-02-27 11:46 AM, "Martin Heidegger" <mh@leichtgewicht.at> wrote:

>Hello Duane,
>
>I used to develop my "all flash" homepages in a way that I represented
>all the data structure I accessed as HTML pages.
>So I got all indexable content out with regular lists and content first.
>Then I started with the Flash Homepage and built it
>entirely on the content of the container homepage: Every Data "resource"
>that I took I pulled of the same underlying system
>including the html code. If I wanted a new "content" I had to add that
>service to the html page. Then I looked that the links worked: So If you
>browsed down to apage/acontent then it send the browser (with flash) to
>a the index page with that url in the background:
>mypage.com/#apage/acontent And the page used this as starting point.
>
>At the end of the day I had all index-able content available as HTML and
>all visible content in the Flash. I used same mechanisms
>parallel for ajax homepages and it worked out quite well.
>
>Do you think a discussion about a examples or a development model in
>this direction would be reasonable?
>
>yours
>Martin.
>
>
>On 28/02/2012 04:20, Duane Nickull wrote:
>> It used to.  To understand how the system works, watch this video:
>>
>> 
>>http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2009/01/flash-search-engine-optimization.
>>ht
>> ml
>>
>> And this video:
>>
>> 
>>http://tv.adobe.com/watch/adobe-evangelists-duane-nickull/seo-secrets-tec
>>hn
>> ology-and-magic-behind-flash/
>>
>>
>> The second one is more important and it start around the 6 minute mark
>> (not sure why Adobe never trimmed it).
>>
>> I honestly think that after watching these, you will all agree there is
>> nothing that belongs on an SDK discussion list WRT SEO.  It is simply
>>not
>> needed.
>>
>> Duane
>>
>> ________________________________________
>>
>> Überity.com
>> President&  COO
>> Adobe LiveCycle ES Consultant Services
>> http://www.uberity.com
>> Blog | http://technoracle.blogspot.com
>> Twitter | @Uberity @duanechaos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12-02-27 10:57 AM, "Omar Gonzalez"<omarg.developer@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Left Right<olegsivokon@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ... and white
>>>> text on white background with postion: absolute top -1000px has a
>>>>better
>>>> chance to affect the crawler than that thing does...
>>>>
>>> That also has a high chance of getting you blacklisted off of search
>>> engines. I wouldn't recommend anyone to do this.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Omar Gonzalez
>>> s9tpepper@apache.org
>>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>>
>>
>>
>



Mime
View raw message