incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Igor Costa <igorco...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Code formatting for patch submissions
Date Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:02:21 GMT
And I missed to wrote.

What are the others contributors think on overall changes in conventions?



Regards
Igor

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Igor Costa <igorcosta@gmail.com> wrote:

> Gordon
>
> The 2 and 3 item I agree with you to remove those asterisks from comments.
>
> 100 is in my point of view is enough due to we don't only have widescreen
> monitors but tablets, that's loop back to CRT. Why? I do view doc
> specification on my iPad using as my second monitor during training and
> fits pretty well on my view.
>
> Again the code guide currently on FB is much more than I can get. And code
> style guide fits pretty much what we need on Apache Flex project.
>
>
> Most devs and contributors of already open program by Adobe are used to
> this code style, changing it is like what happened in flex 3 to flex 4
> migration docs and specs. And the current style fits on the side of each
> Java dev, which is 85% compatible style code guide where you can check out
> here http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/codeconv-138413.html
>
>
>
> Regards
> Igor Costa
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Omar Gonzalez <omarg.developer@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Carol Frampton <cframpto@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2/27/12 1 :55PM, "Gordon Smith" <gosmith@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >I wrote Adobe's coding guidelines for ActionScript and I noticed a few
>> > >ways in which this formatting doesn't match what the framework's
>> current
>> > >conventions:
>> > >
>> > >1. We wrap lines at 80 characters.
>> >
>> > Gordon we changed the wrap to 100 characters last year when we updated
>> the
>> > spec.  If you use FlashBuilder you can configure the Text Editor to show
>> > the print margin at 100 which is a handy reference.
>> >
>> > Carol
>>
>>
>> I think 100 sounds more reasonable. 80 is old school CRT days, I'm pretty
>> sure most people are on widescreen monitors now. Don't want to get carried
>> away either and allow never ending lines, 100 seems reasonable.
>>
>> --
>> Omar Gonzalez
>> s9tpepper@apache.org
>> Apache Flex PPMC Member
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message