incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Piergiorgio Niero <piergiorgio.ni...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Discussion] [Discussion]
Date Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:54:40 GMT
my humble opinion is:
all threads are discussion, if we're going to have many threads on a
specific topic just move those threads in another mailing list.
special things such as voting and polling people are best done with other
tools such as google forms and others. i personally found ridiculous 100+
mail/day with "+1,+20,+N" for voting the logo.

ciao
pigiuz


Il giorno 04 febbraio 2012 20:43, Dave Fisher <dave2wave@comcast.net> ha
scritto:

>
> On Feb 4, 2012, at 10:59 AM, Greg Reddin wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Sent from my mobile device.
> >
> > On Feb 4, 2012, at 12:39 PM, Doug McCune <doug@dougmccune.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Is it really necessary to subject-tag any [Discussion] thread?
> >
> > About the only time that's necessary is when you want to discuss a vote
> thread in progress. It's a good idea to fork that to a discussion thread
> and use the tag to make it clear.
>
> IMHO it is also a good idea to prepare for a [VOTE] thread by first having
> a [DISCUSS] thread (that's the process on private when discussing possible
> new PPMC and committers.) sometimes as this thread implies that is pretty
> obvious.
>
> In a high volume list this will call attention to an issue. Generally we
> should be striving to achieve "LAZY CONSENSUS" when doing that it should be
> a [DISCUSS] or [PROPOSAL] thread. A [VOTE] would then be called if
> consensus is not present.
>
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> >
> > Greg
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message