incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From FRANKLIN GARZON <fgarzo...@hotmail.com>
Subject RE: [RT] Awesome FlexNext User Experience (was: Starting with the Whiteboard code)
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:13:45 GMT

 > Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:00:16 +0900
> From: mh@leichtgewicht.at
> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [RT] Awesome FlexNext User Experience  (was: Starting with the Whiteboard code)
> 
> Dear List,
> 
> it can be hard to find a vision for the next version of Flex. Developers 
> like us like discussions about technical details and they are boring.
> 
> I think that is not enough! I think we need something that inspires us 
> to create something new - something that makes us believe that the 
> things created with Apache Flex are awesome.
> 
> We can make awesome things!
> 
> I propose following: Lets ask everyone who listens for user experience 
> concepts - full or partial. Things that they could see Flex is going to 
> so the PPMC get a better feeling how awesome they could be.
> 
> The proposals should be split in a few categories:
> 
>    *) _HTML/JS compatible:_ To compile mxmlc/AS3 -> html/js the concept 
> has to work within the restrictions of HTML/JS with a optional royal 
> look and feel when being built for Flash without breaking the system. Will be great if
in the same project we can build for HTML5 too.
> 
>    *) _Flash super-powered:_ Systems that leverage the power of the 
> current version of the Flash Player without thinking for a second about 
> HTML: Stage 3D / HD videos / JPEG XR / Slick custom fonts / Pixelbender 
> effects / (generated audio) / ...

>    *) _Touch centric:_ Focussing on the fingers: 
> Swipe/Zoom/Rotate/Expand/Swoosh/... These concepts don't need to care 
> about a mouse or keyboard. Great if ApacheFlex will talk the finggers languaje.  
>    *) _Fully portable:_ Interfaces flexible enough to be represented in 
> the style of various Operation systems without neglecting our need for 
> style. Awesome on Mac/iOS/Windows/Android with few adaptations.
Nice
> Some rule-of-thumbs I can think of:
> 
>     * Responsiveness is key: The more stuff that has to run at a time 
> the less likely it will rock.
>     * All assets should be open-source: Don't build on royal fonts or 
> imagery.
> 
> What would you think of such a request? Is that something that the PPMC 
> think is useful? Should we rock that?
> 
> Note: The various concepts should be presented in the Wiki.
> 
> yours
> Martin.
 		 	   		  
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message