incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [DECISION] Unit Testing and Mocking Frameworks (was: [RT] Recommendation Unit-Test System?)
Date Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:14:04 GMT
My understanding is we should not check in swcs

Sent from my Motorola ATRIX™ 4G on AT&T


-----Original message-----
From: Martin Heidegger <mh@leichtgewicht.at>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Mon, Feb 13, 2012 11:20:55 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [DECISION] Unit Testing and Mocking Frameworks (was: [RT] Recommendation Unit-Test
System?)

On 13/02/2012 18:39, Omar Gonzalez wrote:
>
> Here is the list of compatible licenses:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#category-a and what to do when
> a dependency has incompatible licenses.
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#options -omar

If I don't mistake it then the "binary form" - in our case the swc - can
still be included for category-b licenses while
category a licensed code can be included as both swc and source code -
even the API documentation.

In clear words: The swcs can just be put in the Apache Flex system and
that would be it.
Am I mistaken?

yours
Martin.
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message