> I believe Gordon Smith said in one of the email threads that the new compiler is no longer
generating ActionScript 3 from the MXML files but converting directly to bytecode.
Correct.
- Gordon Smith, Adobe
-----Original Message-----
From: Omar Gonzalez [mailto:omarg.developer@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 9:24 AM
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adobe / Apache / Spoon Flex Tour
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Michael A. Labriola < labriola@digitalprimates.net>
wrote:
> >I am starting to understand what he is pointing out as the
> >shortcomings
> of mxml as implemented, I remember noticing these when first starting
> out but forgot as I focused on using what was available.
>
> Personally, I don't have a problem with MXML. I have a problem with
> what the compiler does with MXML.
>
> Mike
>
>
I believe Gordon Smith said in one of the email threads that the new compiler is no longer
generating ActionScript 3 from the MXML files but converting directly to bytecode. I would
imagine this is the preferred approach, no? I haven't done any compiler dev myself, yet...
but I'm eager to learn.
--
Omar Gonzalez
s9tpepper@apache.org
|