Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of marcus.fritze@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender)
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Logo contest round #2
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Marcus Fritze <marcus.fritze@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F1E078F.9050506@dot-com-it.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:11:12 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CB46A825-7190-4125-9517-637A4AF94FD7@googlemail.com>
References: 
 <CAO1x2tN_Srb61pTsKMRN5sJ7bp4D-hwXbaaX_T9ncWG9eT9G5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <60B1E90B-19CB-4C76-9B36-11922C992084@googlemail.com>
 <4F1E078F.9050506@dot-com-it.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org,
 jeffry@dot-com-it.com

Sorry for my late response but I had to sleep (I live in another =
timezone :-) ).

First of all, I think we all should thank the people who have submitted =
a logo! This was very good work.

@Kitashima Tomo

We should not be disrespectful to the people. It's not good when someone =
is saying that other people are laughing about this work.

So you / they are laughing about the submitted logos? Do it better and =
submit your own logo!!!!

I am not a good designer, so I happy with the logos that were submitted =
so far and I am not laughing about the people!

(Sorry, but this had to be said)

@Jeffry

Here are my personal opinions about the 3 logos:

#49:	As you mentioned in another mail: Yes, I also see a fallen "F". =
And this isn't a good symbolic about the Apache Flex project.
		But the color effect (the red with a little bit orange) =
looks VERY VERY VERY GOOD!!!! And the reflection is nice. Good job!

#42:	Looks good but I don't like the baby-blue color. Maybe we should =
try the #42 with the red-orange colors from #49. An attempt would be =
worth it.

#40:	My personal favorite logo. I think this really reflects the =
"enterprise" ambitions of the Flex SDK. Reliability, stability, clean, =
not to much glitter and colors only straight forward.... Every dot is =
part of a whole package. And all things are working together very well.
		This logo reminds me a little bit of the Apple Xsan =
logo. I don't understand why this logo was not chosen by the PPCM =
members (only 2 votes for this logo, but it has almost as many community =
votes). Maybe it's too late, but I would include #40 into the next =
round. What are the opinions of the members about logo #40? Why wasn't =
the #40 not included in the 2nd round?

(I have already voted #42 in the 2nd round)

Thanks for reading!

Greetings from Germany

Marcus

Am 24.01.2012 um 02:21 schrieb Jeffry Houser:

> On 1/23/2012 7:54 PM, Marcus Fritze wrote:
>> I have some opinions about both logos, but I don't want to share this =
here now, because I will not influence the vote. Unfortunately I'm not =
on the PPMC  members mailing list.
> Please share.  This isn't the time to be silent.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> Jeffry Houser
> Technical Entrepreneur
> 203-379-0773
> --
> http://www.flextras.com?c=3D104
> UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready!
> --
> http://www.theflexshow.com
> http://www.jeffryhouser.com
> http://www.asktheflexpert.com
> --
> Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust
>=20