Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of frederic@exuvis.com
 designates 216.134.213.70 as permitted sender)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9deric_Cox?= <frederic@exuvis.com>
To: Apache Flex Mailing List <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: First Flex release as soon as possible? (was: So, what should
 we do first?)
Thread-Topic: First Flex release as soon as possible? (was: So, what should
 we do first?)
Thread-Index: 
 AQHMy5nTQw3u1x2s+k2JMdXxy9R2RpX9/48A//++cvGAAFjNAIAAAa8A//+u1TyAAGY/AIAAGNWA
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:12:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CB2B7C24.FB09%frederic@exuvis.com>
In-Reply-To: <002c01cccbb8$7a783120$6f689360$@davidarno.org>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.0.0.100825
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <74181219-bfcd-41de-86c7-09b6cc51eaaf>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

I have some projects running on 3.5 and for me it's fine with the current
SDK as those projects just need to be maintained, not improved. I don't
need an updated 3.x release. I would prefer resources to go into Flex 4.x

On 05/01/12 15:44, "David Arno" <david@davidarno.org> wrote:

>> From: Dimitri k. [mailto:koro@noos.fr]
>> Sent: 05 January 2012 13:37
>>=20
>> Maybe it was more the talk about 3.5 Apache release that made me
>> worried we waste some steam on things nobody would use.
>
>Am I the only one stuck having to use 3.5 / 3.6 then? Or is it more the
>case that there is no benefit in diverting resources to improving Flex 3,
>so why even bother creating an Apache version of it?
>
>David.
>
>