Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B6C3BE18 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68828 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2012 23:13:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68772 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2012 23:13:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68761 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2012 23:13:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:13:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of chillthird@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:13:26 +0000 Received: by vbbfc21 with SMTP id fc21so1581706vbb.6 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:13:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=yLOTO3IjbSNzcvPOIo8v4upkSe/9qM6DkIVqhZ1LlO4=; b=FvWoeI8Ht19IiwxcDmrE7iQ+n/Vjo/hnfDQC9qaB/ma4rvTYont//oJlWZ5BbgzOMI dIf+DMsyAuHrOLugH0YarDAlB9Jx1lsoWOVuVqOTc1Xxjw4iv0MGW2syV5z86nJWQOQG RnnrxpSE2+UgzAujOz9IsZhTS4iv1kRbinAmQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.27.236 with SMTP id w12mr3931022vdg.110.1325891585593; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:13:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.152.71 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:13:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 17:13:05 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BlazeDS From: Calvin Hill To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307abcedf850ad04b5e43047 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307abcedf850ad04b5e43047 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Just a newby getting his feet wet... I agree. Flex is a huge enviorement in itself. Besides, getting started myself in this community I already feel overwhelmed. Calvin On Friday, January 6, 2012, Carlos Rovira wrote: > Separate projects IMO. > > One project can have dependencies on other projects and this should not be > a problem. More over if we finaly get maven artifacts ; ) > > We have to take into account that the Flex ecosystem is huge and should be > in the end many projects with subartifacts in each project (modularity is a > big necesity here), since we need to manage the growing of the project in > the long time, so I would prefer to start separating things that we see > right now that could live in diferent projects and have different timelines > and releases. --20cf307abcedf850ad04b5e43047--