Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 239A595C5 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 02:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75000 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2012 02:49:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74815 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2012 02:49:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74698 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2012 02:49:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:49:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dougarthur@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 02:49:35 +0000 Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so48452wgb.0 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:49:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tpVkfhkGoWzpw66utr4gizzZKpbrigyvacZzBzOL11s=; b=sDRd83oqE/FC31Vtn3Yh/jg3bQGKGKpA06kgr/F8lcVHPWfC9zi2VhfnzWhPWelnNk OH84ENptsEfAbejMIL4unblP9ba2m36TCs7U+Le4kAjNLrdBmjbf5aGMYF4GB3xnqcoH pkbzE7bK841QGIoxIJblYeLnExrW34hyHtScA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.20.39 with SMTP id k7mr457196wie.6.1325904554291; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:49:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.103.65 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 18:49:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.103.65 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 18:49:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120106185319.15011xqx59xw4y27@www.teotigraphix.com> References: <4F07816F.2050003@dot-com-it.com> <20120106185319.15011xqx59xw4y27@www.teotigraphix.com> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:49:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FLEX Logo Sketch From: Doug Arthur To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec53d55e9f6f09504b5e73571 --bcaec53d55e9f6f09504b5e73571 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Jan 6, 2012 4:53 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: > > Quoting Carlos Rovira : > >> Hi, >> >> As I said before, I'm thinking that square version could be some icon that >> we already don't have and represents Flex. It should have a good >> combination with this anagram. Make a square version of this logo is near >> impossible since is designed to be wide and flatten. >> >> @Michael: I understand what you mean, I can experiment with the "new >> horizont idea" (although as I said my inspiration was to abstract the arc >> of a Bow (and apache Bow in opposite to the apache feather, but if we get >> to inspire different things the better! :)). In the end the basic two-color >> vector logo should allow us to experiment and end having a variety of end >> versions and results (like does nike, apple and so on...) >> > >> Carlos. >> >> > > Even if you attempted what I was talking about I bet you could still keep your original vision. > > I was just saying try moving the bow a hair down and you might see you get the bow, horizon and see Flex all at once, many symbols contained in one graphic. > > Mike > > I hope I'm not chiming in too late here, but i think the first one Carlos did with the entire arc it's much better. I polled several non-technical, and unbiased sources to see if the concerns about what the logo said were founded our not. Here's what I did... I asked several nurses and lab techs at a doctors appointment today what they saw at a quick glance, and everyone of them were able to clearly read what was presented to them. In addition, everyone was in awe with the graphics and thought it looked really cool. It was sad that I couldn't take credit for such good work, telling them it wasn't my design. I also pinged my wife, which is familiar with the word, but she also especially liked the first one better. In addition to my wife, several of her friends that are unbiased had the same reaction to the test. In short, I really like the first one, and definitely cast my +1 for that one so far. I hope others see this point and can agree with me on that. My test proves that that logo makes a solid statement. Now I'm not totally against nudging the arc down or doing some tweaks to it, but I think it's good a it stands, and I definitely prefer the whole arc compared to the sliced one. Good job Carlos! Now it's truly up to the community on what logo gets selected, and I think this contest idea will be great, and I honestly hope to see even more from the community before it's over and one is selecting. This community it's thriving, and things like this will drive great innovation with what we can do as a community! Just so there's no confusion, I'm taking about this logo proposal: http://www.carlosrovira.com/apache-flex-logo-proposal.png - Doug And that's my $0.02. --bcaec53d55e9f6f09504b5e73571--