Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0019B50B for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:44:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77175 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 19:44:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77068 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 19:44:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77060 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2012 19:44:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:44:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bortsen@googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.41 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.41] (HELO mail-ww0-f41.google.com) (74.125.82.41) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:44:02 +0000 Received: by wgbed3 with SMTP id ed3so3290721wgb.0 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:43:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=WRq+oyQaUQZL5fAUiYhsCQBcelrTD+sxjRb2nLnU4ow=; b=i7sWKVGwynSXIiGgTe+4tVenSi1i6BGoTTFGKhfUUryypdFEV2ptNo4/kFqi3uCmAX fg/d7lgR5sFii3Lifz8j5OjCqIcsJCzidZlbqSAmAcW0ecGUfnLDojkHWVLFzm/bqmc9 5jOaElTXWh1oEXSWa30uLOR8KFigha9a54u8Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.75.7 with SMTP id y7mr38440252wiv.2.1326224622016; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:43:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.164.74 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:43:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <47E5148E-98B5-481B-8FD9-FF3228F9D801@gmail.com> <4F0C72C9.9080102@dot-com-it.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:43:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Did Flex lost contact to its investors? From: Dirk Eismann To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0434bf567cd78d04b631bbbe X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0434bf567cd78d04b631bbbe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 really depends on the client I think. We got some inquiries recently, the biggest was some 100+ days of pure Flex work - and they *did* know the full story, but they also know there's no alternative for them. Other clients did not knew the story, we told them because we think it's fair to tell it and still they don't care. Others indeed hold back their projects now. @Jeffry Houser > Lucky you! In Germany it is seems to be quiet > now. Maybe I should send you my CV ;) > --f46d0434bf567cd78d04b631bbbe--