Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1EE79FCB for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 09:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53772 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2012 09:22:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53566 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jan 2012 09:22:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53494 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jan 2012 09:21:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:21:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of carlos.rovira@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.175] (HELO mail-yx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.213.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 09:21:51 +0000 Received: by yenm12 with SMTP id m12so975281yen.6 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:21:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8n8uRczFzg04yZWICujwh/qaB6xTUf/InSvAKvacsAM=; b=h3fKPBpFMLPbIkDqwWoJlK1NuxR1nQAaUURNxIxF2p8IZADEOdgBcMCd61fonQ7z5y vQhZZ/YVZCRkHrTsB9AegJWAQ9Jk4hhaUX5gGY3vLuzTba68ZPBx2SGE/Zjsullmn2HT vefH5dXVqGFKjet3Z55ml7gNmjn8m/+dBqfE8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.139.132 with SMTP id c4mr11414041yhj.68.1325928090757; Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:21:30 -0800 (PST) Sender: carlos.rovira@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.113.4 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 01:21:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F07816F.2050003@dot-com-it.com> <20120106185319.15011xqx59xw4y27@www.teotigraphix.com> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2012 10:21:30 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LbczQjSfI_hs3DAtCA59eqAT9dg Message-ID: Subject: Re: FLEX Logo Sketch From: Carlos Rovira To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303e9e10d8ea5304b5ecb05f --20cf303e9e10d8ea5304b5ecb05f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Doug, many thank for you words and for take the time to consult others about the design. :) If I can express my opinion about the broken/unbroken arc issue. I'm with you and think I end preferring the unbroken (first version). This is after some hours of sleep and seeing the two in comparision. But for not going to much far, I think we get the contest and not invest more time until we know clearly if this way would the one to continue evolving. I only will think in a square icon and report here if get something interesting. C. 2012/1/7 Doug Arthur > On Jan 6, 2012 4:53 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote: > > > > Quoting Carlos Rovira : > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> As I said before, I'm thinking that square version could be some icon > that > >> we already don't have and represents Flex. It should have a good > >> combination with this anagram. Make a square version of this logo is > near > >> impossible since is designed to be wide and flatten. > >> > >> @Michael: I understand what you mean, I can experiment with the "new > >> horizont idea" (although as I said my inspiration was to abstract the > arc > >> of a Bow (and apache Bow in opposite to the apache feather, but if we > get > >> to inspire different things the better! :)). In the end the basic > two-color > >> vector logo should allow us to experiment and end having a variety of > end > >> versions and results (like does nike, apple and so on...) > >> > > > >> Carlos. > >> > >> > > > > Even if you attempted what I was talking about I bet you could still ke= ep > your original vision. > > > > I was just saying try moving the bow a hair down and you might see you > get the bow, horizon and see Flex all at once, many symbols contained in > one graphic. > > > > Mike > > > > > > I hope I'm not chiming in too late here, but i think the first one Carlos > did with the entire arc it's much better. I polled several non-technical, > and unbiased sources to see if the concerns about what the logo said were > founded our not. > > Here's what I did... > I asked several nurses and lab techs at a doctors appointment today what > they saw at a quick glance, and everyone of them were able to clearly rea= d > what was presented to them. In addition, everyone was in awe with the > graphics and thought it looked really cool. It was sad that I couldn't > take credit for such good work, telling them it wasn't my design. > > I also pinged my wife, which is familiar with the word, but she also > especially liked the first one better. > > In addition to my wife, several of her friends that are unbiased had the > same reaction to the test. > > In short, I really like the first one, and definitely cast my +1 for that > one so far. I hope others see this point and can agree with me on that. M= y > test proves that that logo makes a solid statement. > > Now I'm not totally against nudging the arc down or doing some tweaks to > it, but I think it's good a it stands, and I definitely prefer the whole > arc compared to the sliced one. > > Good job Carlos! > > Now it's truly up to the community on what logo gets selected, and I thin= k > this contest idea will be great, and I honestly hope to see even more fro= m > the community before it's over and one is selecting. This community it's > thriving, and things like this will drive great innovation with what we c= an > do as a community! > > Just so there's no confusion, I'm taking about this logo proposal: > http://www.carlosrovira.com/apache-flex-logo-proposal.png > > - Doug > And that's my $0.02. > --=20 Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnolog=EDa M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 CODEOSCOPIC S.A. Avd. del General Per=F3n, 32 Planta 10, Puertas P-Q 28020 Madrid --20cf303e9e10d8ea5304b5ecb05f--