Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A3F8B814 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:53:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11051 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2012 14:53:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11023 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2012 14:53:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11015 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2012 14:53:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:53:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:53:11 +0000 Received: by bkaq10 with SMTP id q10so1575749bka.6 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:52:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.10.73 with SMTP id o9mr1802770bko.99.1327243968585; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:52:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.117.12 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:52:48 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [173.10.39.57] In-Reply-To: <4F1C21A2.9050504@dot-com-it.com> References: <4F1C21A2.9050504@dot-com-it.com> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:52:48 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ApacheFlex Versioning (was Re: A newbie's guide to building the SDK (and a question)) From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFIcMB2PCvt8P3YH3WhERUVrBuKNOCDn47WlZnHI50JTig5ewe+O7jL7zG3HWLsC2Wi6Jn Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175d04bc471e9e04b71f11f6 --0015175d04bc471e9e04b71f11f6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This version number scheme has been in my mind the entire time. It makes complete sense. -Nick On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jeffry Houser wrote: > On 1/22/2012 9:44 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > >> Thoughts? Do we need a vote for versioning scheme? >> > > This approach seems logical enough to me and I have nothing else to add. > > -- > Jeffry Houser > Technical Entrepreneur > 203-379-0773 > -- > http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > -- > http://www.theflexshow.com > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > http://www.asktheflexpert.com > -- > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > > --0015175d04bc471e9e04b71f11f6--