Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5456FBC97 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 96598 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2012 23:28:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96403 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2012 23:28:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 96395 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2012 23:28:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 23:28:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 23:27:57 +0000 Received: by bkbzt4 with SMTP id zt4so1208795bkb.6 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:27:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.126.137 with SMTP id gw9mr6163819bkc.135.1326065256076; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:27:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.114.5 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:27:35 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [173.10.39.57] In-Reply-To: References: <1326040343.38722.androidMobile@web120705.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 18:27:35 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Flex logo contest page publish [Last Detail - thoughts] From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6746c89972404b60ca077 --000e0cd6746c89972404b60ca077 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Requiring everybody to sign an ICLA is a bit much, and I would seriously discourage it. The ICLA required a two week review from the GC at my office before I could sign it (with you work for an entity like a university, IBM, Lucent, etc, where they own everything you do, there is a lot of hee-hawing to sign an agreement that forces them to allow me to donate work to somebody else). That being said, having it signed for the winner should be expected, and I think it is pretty well spelled out in text we voted on. -Nick On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Doug Arthur wrote: > On Jan 8, 2012 10:02 AM, "Doug Arthur" wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 8, 2012 9:32 AM, "Mihai Ene" wrote: > > > > > > You cannot use an anonymous submission platform (like a blog, Twitter > or personal websites) because every user who submits materials needs to > sign the apache ICLA > > > Thus, i am afraid that the mailing list remains the only option so far. > > > > > > Mihai Ene > > > > > > > Good point, but that sucks. It's a good medium for exposure, and everyone > has access to that platform without extra sign up efforts. > > - Doug > > > > Including the mailing list, as private communication is discouraged. > Sorry if it was just an oversight. > > I have another thought about this. Why can't they use a public medium, and > if it's the one accepted, that one person signs an ICLA? Surely we're not > going to hamper entries by requiring all entrants to sign an ICLA up front? > Or, would it be acceptable to put it in the entry contest rules that their > submission constitutes the signing of the ICLA, like other contest states > they have rights to your submissions for promotional purposes? > > - Doug > --000e0cd6746c89972404b60ca077--