Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51CF697CB for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 03:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22298 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2012 03:31:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22197 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2012 03:30:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22189 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jan 2012 03:30:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 03:30:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.47] (HELO mail-bk0-f47.google.com) (209.85.214.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 03:30:46 +0000 Received: by bkbzt4 with SMTP id zt4so1293245bkb.6 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:30:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.38.80 with SMTP id a16mr6355166bke.99.1326079825599; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 19:30:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.114.5 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 19:30:25 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [173.10.39.57] In-Reply-To: References: <447A7463-A1E2-4945-8CE6-0E67E49F8A71@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:30:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flex Usage Statistics From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555a2d6f2de4604b61004ae X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00032555a2d6f2de4604b61004ae Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 No problem -- like I said, I know you didn't do it intentionally, but that is one of the things where people voting for features and collectivally putting together the surveys would solve. -Nick On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Sebastian Mohr wrote: > Oh ... I see! > > I thought I caught this case with this answer: > > "I have developed my own MVC Microarchitecture(s)" > > But you are right ... I should have added this answer, too: > > "I don't use the MVC architectural design pattern in my Flex project(s)" > > Sorry ... this was my first one shot survey :) > > > - Sebastian > > > > On Jan 9, 2012, at 2:04 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: > > Understood, but the survey is making the grand assumption that /everybody/ >> is using some sort of MVC framework, which was my point. There is no out >> on the survey, and some people (like myself) would simply not answer the >> survey at all. >> >> While in the Flex world, there is an overwhelming majority of the people >> that use MVC style frameworks, that is not the case for 100% of the >> population. I personally use an I-O style of programming, which is not >> really MVC. >> >> -Nick >> >> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Sebastian Mohr >> wrote: >> >> @Nick ... Thx for your comment. The intent of Question 2: >>> >>> http://code.google.com/p/****masuland/wiki/Statistics#** >>> Question_2:_Which_Model-View-****Controller_(MVC)_**** >>> Microarchitectures>> wiki/Statistics#Question_2:_**Which_Model-View-Controller_(** >>> MVC)_Microarchitectures >>> > >>> >>> >>> ... was definitely not to suggest a specific Microarchitecture. Instead, >>> it should only show which Microarchitecture has been used more often >>> in Flex developers past projects. And the result makes sense to me, >>> because, Cairngorm 2 and PureMVC where the first MVC >>> Microarchitecture frameworks for Flex. >>> >>> It wasn't a "Which Microsarchitecture do you like the most?" >>> question. But I see your point that this could be misinterpreted >>> somehow ;) >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:18 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote: >>> >>> Agreed, 100%. >>> >>>> >>>> Surveys outside of that can be swayed to however the creator wants it to >>>> end up. For example, with all the people I talk to, Caringorm has been >>>> barely a blip on anybody's radar for at least two years -- where this >>>> survey shows a completely different story (and steers people to >>>> suggested >>>> use of Caringorm). I doubt that was the author's intent, but it was >>>> pretty >>>> glaring to me. >>>> >>>> -Nick >>>> >>>> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 1/8/12 12:58 AM, "Sebastian Mohr" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Do you see the need to make more surveys? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I would want JIRA to be our constantly running survey. Folks put in >>>>> issues, >>>>> the community votes on it. Serious discussion should probably happen >>>>> on >>>>> the >>>>> list. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alex Harui >>>>> Flex SDK Team >>>>> Adobe Systems, Inc. >>>>> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> > --00032555a2d6f2de4604b61004ae--