Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 222C9BDFA for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76698 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 15:02:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74610 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 15:02:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74595 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2012 15:02:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:02:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gredbug@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.175] (HELO mail-gx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.161.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:02:08 +0000 Received: by ggno1 with SMTP id o1so1022609ggn.6 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:01:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nG0SWFUaBR5ihjj+E1F7G7ZLKxm0DahCk2YEmRAwcZI=; b=QTz0wnxVLgku4LQhoon4qUTGBJIa/7Q+UF9H7PPUmkdKnx94bUOBs49EfNgPqicMBD Hf7vndXBhROfPCvhzuCLbhEMWsxdGyIrYZB3LSbL2eXoClxUzxFJGFykGYQgGgsPzqPY 9r5PB50LN1cxDVHr3N1pe2UeC1FT6Sy9kC7N8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.207.72 with SMTP id lu8mr4604395igc.0.1326380507337; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:01:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.144.137 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:01:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20269C1D2B00D24682F1C89E6F0A90A028D6CA@SBOCMX001.exchad.jpmchase.net> References: <20269C1D2B00D24682F1C89E6F0A90A028D6CA@SBOCMX001.exchad.jpmchase.net> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:01:47 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flex and Maven From: Greg Reddin To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Skogen, Espen wrote: > Hi all, > > How do you all feel about publishing Flex as Maven artifacts, now that we get going? > JPM and other banks I've worked in all rely on Maven and Flexmojos for their Flex build process - It would make sense if the Apache Flex project used Maven as well, so that as we release, it's immediately available from the Apache maven repo. > > Thoughts? This wouldn't limit the use of Ant for those who prefer that - it would just simplify the process for everybody using Flexmojos. As soon as there is code to publish I intend to take a look at it. I'd really like to see us publish to Maven repos.