Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0214BA1F for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34784 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2012 17:00:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34739 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2012 17:00:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 34731 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2012 17:00:08 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:00:08 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of csomakk@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:00:00 +0000 Received: by wgbdr11 with SMTP id dr11so11554345wgb.0 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:59:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iCu7BuUcUola02PPsJQGpV9AHL1Ehcv7OHSD4gZEYVw=; b=RrWuFRvvNxVDPe4bDKEdFZPiBtUdf6opvoWH5NBzT+lJ0sW6ClbIF5innd9OQ9Z2WU a3m+1AaBGOW2SwW9QXTGu33oyzGs6G5B9y4nyA91xiNKOODtfSThXrUPMiJd0C5J6EU8 LVimt1CsFc0BGpbltg+T5AZowxPUHFcSJGT7I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.139.223 with SMTP id c73mr5951933wej.1.1326905980244; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:59:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.20.202 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:59:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:59:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: jira task to decide on Apache Flex version number needed From: =?ISO-8859-1?B?Q3NvbeFrIEfhYm9y?= To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org, peter.elst@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6de14499a536804b6d05ff6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6de14499a536804b6d05ff6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Adobe will finish 4.6, then donate that as well. Then we can use it, and Flex is completely under Apache. On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Peter Elst wrote: > > Adobe is shipping Adobe Flex 4.6.0 and we can't rule out the possibility > > that there might be an Adobe Flex 4.6.x. > > > wow, really - potentially a Flex 4.6.x released under the Adobe name? Not > sure what to think about that, was under the assumption no Flex was > completely under Apache now. Isn't the trademark donated etc. > > - Peter > --0016e6de14499a536804b6d05ff6--