Return-Path: 
 <flex-dev-return-822-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E64A89B63
	for <apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Mon,  9 Jan 2012 17:25:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 8768 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2012 17:25:00 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 8733 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jan 2012 17:25:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:flex-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <flex-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: moderator for flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 49131 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2012 20:30:15 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jmgorena@gmail.com designates
 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=iS4elocrFDcT1rkg7tpoQm1biyxtCponRk+bumqdbWE=;
        b=OOT+XWXoZYbkb5EjBq65hh1xvHRLpOtKPTTIEdLfrfvE+T0ZN2V/dgCNAkSCfowWQI
         aCl6ZX5T+lnzTBybDO3IhOTUpLSv8II21hI5XwNnRAXFNsMRQPe7uFOPRV58JYNilC3K
         SttTyc8RSMbE1JoIcJ7A+Ip3DCevEon81LwPY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+67v59YhvExR1JjjJi4uneSzJkHQpOHEmjVqT5zfmXvy7dx9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <619FF30DF29E46C388807294826A807E@ajobi.net>
	<CB2A8953.FA2B%frederic@exuvis.com>
	<CA+67v5_WU1oFG8QZuaOGFWknKQB7D9wvaQ5CVxkC5+7OoK+QUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F04D4C3.8060402@dot-com-it.com>
	<CA+67v58sO-ZJ4PfdXtDL0pJg++ED4cASPcYb4fcEpKv505VwEA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F05ADAD.40603@dot-com-it.com>
	<CA+67v59YhvExR1JjjJi4uneSzJkHQpOHEmjVqT5zfmXvy7dx9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:29:47 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <CAHGaOUyWfE3KJ91HaNmxk0vXQqkBhhd2v7QY=dDavHJV1qOJMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Flex performance
From: John Gorena <jmgorena@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org, rajubitter@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00032555f6eaf354e104b5e1e88e
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--00032555f6eaf354e104b5e1e88e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

I'm betting that they're porting over the entire flash API to JS to make
conversion nearly 1:1 from an API standpoint.

--00032555f6eaf354e104b5e1e88e--