Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jotaefebr@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F0719C8.8090408@webfuel.pt>
References: 
 <CAMFKFRjy3CZkmdrOAU4WpP48etTUzttzn4OuS_=qUtcfP=yJYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F0719C8.8090408@webfuel.pt>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:08:20 -0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGcAFObGb0yMJ1=et7CaScxkd6Gzr9T1DF2dOZuxs=dNrjhm_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Mavenization of Apache Flex
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Felipe_=2D_Jotaefe?= <jotaefebr@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044285f2eeb07204b5de4198

--f46d044285f2eeb07204b5de4198
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I may be wrong, but this issue was strong within Adobe, working with Flex
Mojos ->
https://github.com/flexmojos

The request was here
http://ideas.adobe.com/ct/ct_a_view_idea.bix?c=3D975F47A1-B925-4456-89DB-3B=
EFB1DA7780&idea_id=3DC4BB27BA-4AFD-48EE-BE2B-BFA78361FB74

I agree with the viewpoint of Carlos Rovira +1

;)
--------------------------------------------
Jo=E3o Felipe "Jotaefe" Lima
--------------------------------------------
http://www.jotaefe.com


Em 6 de janeiro de 2012 13:56, Jo=E3o Saleiro <joao.saleiro@webfuel.pt>escr=
eveu:

>
> On 06-01-2012 15:50, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>
>> now that we involved in the set up of Apache Flex and Apache is the same
>> house of Maven I would ask to you guys if providing mavenized artifacts =
of
>> the flex sdk is in high priority or not.
>>
>
> +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 +1
>
> The modularization of the SDK and providing it as artifacts in the "Maven
> way" should be pretty high priority.
>
> Jo=E3o Saleiro
> @joaosaleiro
>

--f46d044285f2eeb07204b5de4198--