Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6ECB7B217 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20668 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 18:28:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 20614 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 18:28:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 20606 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2012 18:28:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:28:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of adobeflexengineer@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.47] (HELO mail-pz0-f47.google.com) (209.85.210.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:28:46 +0000 Received: by dadz13 with SMTP id z13so835198dad.6 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:28:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=QmQFvK1bSdD6u8dbtwejY92hqJIaLuwsJEY5z4ofKss=; b=feldjMDDt2DtfjCV5Gdp7U1Fke1GQJVwyy+8fLPac8NLeJClK+tyXK9Dz9m5WJutBP VnpbOoNexbF/KHHgE7eT+Xi2yfWDXWuxqg07EpFcsS6PASHU04HF1yzK27kmETtrctBn IijdtdHpf87x1ckoSBDR+Ox2wfAw2yNh84MwQ= Received: by 10.68.73.234 with SMTP id o10mr52959797pbv.90.1326220104739; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:28:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.26.103 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:28:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <40BDD28C-413B-48DD-A7FD-19F7A9672E58@gmail.com> <527DC39672C34D4B9071A6DB27565439@KORODESKTOP> From: Stephane Beladaci Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:28:03 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What about Spark skinning and performance? Does Spark skinning affects or not the performance of an application? I personally really like Spark and tend to prefer skins over lose CSS styling, however I heard from some colleague that Spark skinning had negative effect on performance, I was never able to confirm or not. On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Doug McCune wrote: >> >> >> I think spark is valid entirely without Fc. >> > > >> The only problem with spark right now is that need urgently to have some >> core components that today are obsolete in MX. >> >> > Yeah, you and Michael make the point that Spark is a good improvement > regardless of Fc, and I wasn't really trying to argue that it wasn't. I was > more lamenting the fact that a large amount of brainpower and man-hours > went into getting things capable of working with the Fc tooling. Manpower > that would have been better spent focusing on the core framework (and not > the Fc tooling considerations) and the component set. When I look at Fc I > just see a whole lot of wasted energy on all sides (framework engineers, > Flash Builder engineers, and Fc engineers).