Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B13A39865 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73714 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2012 10:30:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73652 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2012 10:30:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 73644 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2012 10:30:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:30:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of peter.elst@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.47] (HELO mail-qw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.216.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:30:09 +0000 Received: by qap15 with SMTP id 15so1667486qap.6 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:29:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=vansw6wYDE1b+c26lNDn/cYB+1hAASbpQF7jmNrKm14=; b=Nlh9BLehMfveLoSLRX+Q7dApn608Tic+hge1Y3hNT/lux9Lsyc8IgOeGyfyKzKiELz l/ypw815QW9GhVRqf9C+MYrAmtspoEGrceFXbnm+peqr2Quqr/8+LleckYjRc4+rZd+1 gooVTdPSFJRKIPwtaEqGEvgfWjTqWXlwj15hw= Received: by 10.224.210.7 with SMTP id gi7mr9419690qab.58.1326623388117; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:29:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.133.207 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:29:27 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: peter.elst@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <7087560d$59c0a553$1e63cc42$@com> From: Peter Elst Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:29:27 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Non-core code, contrib and samples (was: Goal for Flex: Strengthening large-scale Flex applications...) To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300facc9cca9f304b68e9351 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf300facc9cca9f304b68e9351 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Would there be any legal issues when using > third party Opensource libraries in these Apache > Flex code examples? > > Here are some Opensource-Microarchitectures Can't speak to any legal issues but personally I'd prefer generic plain vanilla Flex code examples rather than examples of various microarchitectures, trying to keep those in sync as they change and ending up with more support questions about the third party implementations than the actual Flex SDK. - Peter --20cf300facc9cca9f304b68e9351--