Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6B0DD3B4-E307-46C1-8498-8EF2DA251965@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAEdpnA37qM_kJMs3=fGQcQ6+J0XBMKv=h9r+5=AqZbSUBvUsPA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CB38F81E.3A10F%aharui@adobe.com>
	<CAF2yXuoWFhWenBvzdVL6+4CVXCJFF1QxJg6mEgLE3a+Qirt1VA@mail.gmail.com>
	<6B0DD3B4-E307-46C1-8498-8EF2DA251965@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:57:08 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAEFz_vuoUBchBBhDoW1TKbefnkfj6QG9Gs+HFypvfVG3+DDrEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Code Example / Application Development Procedure (was:
 Re: Non-core code, contrib and samples (was: Goal for Flex: Strengthening
 large-scale Flex applications...))
From: Omar Gonzalez <omarg.developer@gmail.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6daa8233fd61c04b6e2c7a6

--0016e6daa8233fd61c04b6e2c7a6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Application architecture, coding conventions and "best practices" are all
topics with high contention. People usually have very strong opinions on
what they think is the "right way" and what they will not do. Because of
that I would rather prefer that we steered way clear of trying to come up
with sample code that tries to come off as telling programmers how they
should be coding flex, with or without third party frameworks.

I think we should concentrate on improving and fixin the SDK. There are
quite literally tons of Flex code examples out there.

That said you are free to work on whatever you want but I think you wanted
opinions if you posted on the list.

-omar

--0016e6daa8233fd61c04b6e2c7a6--