Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B20B29987 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94354 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2012 14:08:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94265 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2012 14:08:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94257 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2012 14:08:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:08:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lostirc@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.54] (HELO mail-qw0-f54.google.com) (209.85.216.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:08:45 +0000 Received: by qaea17 with SMTP id a17so539323qae.6 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:08:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=LyZLRJH9n3KTz0hjbybUNVTzGtuM/4wMTT7pNSFRJis=; b=avpsY29ag7AEOjU6HID2iBbN9ofWchZlzNc+r7tVn/4s2c9OW0UTfY5rdozpX8Yebs UA3ipCCre1h2MzqMipMYf4waIWBlAXcHVY3mAdxGQvntlupj+SgizrPFfdswoAckuaHa W5x28JAXzhJ5th8f4xuuH2DlqeHEj8OhkxB/s= Received: by 10.224.177.5 with SMTP id bg5mr2646580qab.87.1327586904582; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:08:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.90.14 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 06:07:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Frank Altomare Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 09:07:44 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flex 5 should be divided to desktop project and mobile project To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b397dce03db2afe04b76ee9fe X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --485b397dce03db2afe04b76ee9fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > I, on the other hand, would 100% disagree and say that mobile features ar= e > very important. > > +1, I would actually say a focus on Mobile performance will really help out the project On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ivan Ilija=C5=A1i=C4=87 wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Jonathan Campos >wrote: > > > > > I, on the other hand, would 100% disagree and say that mobile features > are > > very important. > > > > > +1 > --=20 Francis Altomare, --485b397dce03db2afe04b76ee9fe--