Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2138DBA55 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38593 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 19:41:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38519 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 19:41:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38508 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2012 19:41:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:41:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of randy.troppmann@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:41:35 +0000 Received: by werm13 with SMTP id m13so1871183wer.6 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:41:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5yggIARFF4bdXUieZzsllakA1L5+pVSA+BdFBeFP4qA=; b=qtXKHs+/+BghUzXchYFMzBcWNwqVdrTBZm+XsdC+kMxIn7qYt4Pp7Zpzp1Co1NIDZI noes9TMdO8gU+hhyydbRUbjrBVFdTh+aErwoNIeis94VZo/O/eF8M1/UJ4MGopQzfTD0 Wu2GTG7tGVyqoyKpH88nMF/+r7eIyyczE8Tyw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.138.153 with SMTP id a25mr2178247wej.18.1326397274487; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.41.201 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:41:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120112143110.104755iver6vrtha@www.teotigraphix.com> References: <20120112120925.18055uctfa0993np@www.teotigraphix.com> <4F0F1E1E.1040004@dot-com-it.com> <20120112131254.20047clbhmta98rq@www.teotigraphix.com> <049a01ccd159$6b58d4a0$420a7de0$@spoon.as> <20120112143110.104755iver6vrtha@www.teotigraphix.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:41:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] PPMC members to decide voting procedure From: Randy Troppmann To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > All I was trying to do is get it nailed down so there is no cluster bomb > that turns into two sides. If you notice what I have been doing on this > list, it has been trying to clear things up and get them cemented so they > I know I'm capable of voting for a logo, what you said could be offensive to > some. > > The above quote is WHAT I was trying to clear up because I saw divide > happening between members and community. > Poorly thought out and worded email on my part. I was just trying to say it would be preferable to have the wider community involved in the decision. But I understand that this may be logistically difficult and I don't want to interrupt the process already underway. I just want to see this project get the best logo possible. +1 to be added to vote on this matter :) - Randy