Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 119D9B39F for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 3331 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2012 17:07:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3305 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2012 17:07:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 3292 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2012 17:07:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:07:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nithya4flex@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:07:37 +0000 Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so6604120wgb.0 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:07:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XrMn4E6S9g8uTugG9L7pPkhOFHwDDyl2qX9slnc6Mn0=; b=FGLzhdhPA3MnTq1bKfsqWdk6I1KLD6v7gLp4r25VergkGBlZQuO8pYqqNkyMCLIuFS cartitmJ1mwaBOuCFLx3JKDUDFeM30X2b26tkzEwZ47PlU5SBku/gJKN2Gdz+aqHCD8T bu7Q59KhoEAcz8ppL3PDftwIjbxkx/WFCkwyo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.100.234 with SMTP id fb10mr9370031wib.5.1327252034979; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:07:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.234.92 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:07:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F1C21A2.9050504@dot-com-it.com> <20120122101154.14311ywgnns9l8hm@www.teotigraphix.com> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:37:14 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ApacheFlex Versioning (was Re: A newbie's guide to building the SDK (and a question)) From: nithya flex To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043748f312856904b720f20c --f46d043748f312856904b720f20c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I want join development team, please guide me On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 10:29 PM, FRANKLIN GARZON wr= ote: > > I Suggest put in 2 ways the versions, like some very big companies, a > version system like: > For developers and major control: > Use the Omer proposal, it's basic and necesary absolutly. > For commercial and more friendly understand: > Use the year. For example: > Apache Flex 2012 (v4.6.x) > Apache Flex 2012 (v 4.7.x) > Apache Flex 2013 (v5.0.x) > Of course this is the community, but we need to think also in the > commercial way appart to not get any special payment. But is a community > marketing, also think in the future events you can say: The event of Flex > 2012, more marketing no? > > > Franklin Garz=F3n > > Regional Team Leader > > MCTS - MCITP Microsoft SQLServer 2005 > > > *Si el hombre dejara de aprender entonces dejar=EDa de existir* > > 094496862 / 593-022234585 > > > > From: joan.llenas.maso@gmail.com > > Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 16:17:23 +0100 > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ApacheFlex Versioning (was Re: A newbie's guide > to building the SDK (and a question)) > > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > > > > From a developer standpoint is less problematic to use years. > > From a product standpoint has less impact because users always know wha= t > to > > expect. > > > > > > -- > > Joan Llenas Mas=F3 > > http://joan.garnet.io > > @joangarnet (es) > > @joanllenas (en) > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 16:11, Michael Schmalle >wrote: > > > > > Does anyone have any idea why Alex suggested years? Was there a reaso= n? > > > > > > I am in agreement as well with what Omar stated, just curious why Ale= x > > > would deviate from what most developers were expecting. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > Quoting Yennick Trevels : > > > > > > Simple, logical and easy to understand for "the outside world". > Perfect > > >> imo. > > >> > > >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Jonathan Campos < > jonbcampos@gmail.com > > >> >wrote: > > >> > > >> It is also what I thought from the beginning. > > >>> > > >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski < > nicholas@spoon.as > > >>> >wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > This version number scheme has been in my mind the entire time. = It > > >>> makes > > >>> > complete sense. > > >>> > > > >>> > -Nick > > >>> > > > >>> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Jeffry Houser < > jeffry@dot-com-it.com > > >>> > >wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > > On 1/22/2012 9:44 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > > >>> > > > > >>> > >> Thoughts? Do we need a vote for versioning scheme? > > >>> > >> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > This approach seems logical enough to me and I have nothing > else to > > >>> add. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > Jeffry Houser > > >>> > > Technical Entrepreneur > > >>> > > 203-379-0773 > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > http://www.flextras.com?c=3D104 > > >>> > > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > http://www.theflexshow.com > > >>> > > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > > >>> > > http://www.asktheflexpert.com > > >>> > > -- > > >>> > > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Jonathan Campos > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --f46d043748f312856904b720f20c--