Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21A019E47 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39664 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2012 21:58:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39558 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2012 21:58:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39547 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2012 21:58:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:58:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.47] (HELO mail-vw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:58:33 +0000 Received: by vbbfc21 with SMTP id fc21so938078vbb.6 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:58:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.94.227 with SMTP id df3mr612107vdb.51.1326319092189; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:58:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.109.201 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:57:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <21F668673FA0C04AB9042388AC13A414037EFBC6E9@exch-mbx-111.vmware.com> From: Doug McCune Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:57:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IRC Channel link on website? To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307d048e5948ac04b647ba57 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf307d048e5948ac04b647ba57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I think the reason is we don't have an Apache Flex release yet, meaning > there are no users of it that warrants a mailing list Isn't the first release going to be the same as the latest Adobe Flex release? Why wouldn't we want to support those users? (Apologies if I've missed some prior discussion that indicates that the initial commit of source code will be substantially different than the latest Adobe Flex code). --20cf307d048e5948ac04b647ba57--