Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEB78B005 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75578 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 22:48:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75540 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 22:48:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 75527 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2012 22:48:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:48:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rajubitter@googlemail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:48:34 +0000 Received: by iafi7 with SMTP id i7so3529003iaf.6 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:48:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nEVW/ydjGi+lkBCNir5fJ5o/ZzS3sqLyUvVSoNndCWw=; b=BYNJKDgzT25fFhJeqXaTD8SeOj+1Jxt4XhTD1zcE8XUivH0ikclJmuP+yVQz3nMhMA M92taq/wvtiucpyU6UHnITA5HwPZwa6GsmI+ofdHA9IKkwktxVDvgN+CUnYv4IBlAn2S 3hTdz0E55lYkHz+L8iQS8pA2SkJ3vyoTRd2zQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.151.4 with SMTP id c4mr5594958icw.39.1326408493744; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:48:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.199.9 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:48:13 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: rajubitter@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:48:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Have the SWF 11 and SWF 12 file format specification ever been published? From: Raju Bitter To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org That should have been SWF 11 and SWF 11.1 of course.