Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of marcus.fritze@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.214.47 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Subject: Re: [LOGO] Voting
From: Marcus Fritze <marcus.fritze@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAF2yXupOYk=s3mPZMroztVsQN2eN5Bn75_fxY87wHER6h6+X=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:59:39 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A35D8327-5014-48B2-BD5C-06781514A044@googlemail.com>
References: <CB39C14C.5B82%cframpto@adobe.com>
 <01371B82-B23B-446B-A63E-FC7F793C7ADF@cesaric.com>
 <566E90BF-1818-4723-A927-DED93C1607E6@mac.com>
 <14774ECF-9442-479B-9B50-CD88049E4ED3@cesaric.com>
 <274F8554-E668-4C76-B204-C1AFBBF5E992@mac.com>
 <A865E5E0-07AF-4857-BF12-3A174C1FAFFC@arteveldehs.be>
 <CAF2yXupOYk=s3mPZMroztVsQN2eN5Bn75_fxY87wHER6h6+X=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org,
 Marcus Fritze <marcus.fritze@googlemail.com>

Currently, afaik we have 36 logos.

Here is my suggestion:=20

Every logo gets his own ID (1-36) (because some creators submitted =
multiple logos) - this ID should be in front of the logo creator on the =
logo wiki page.

Because of the amount of logos we can maybe award places from 1st to 6th =
and use the following "championship" table ;-)

1st: 10 points
2nd:  6 points
3rd:   4 points
4th:   3 points
5th:   2 points
6th:   1 point

How to vote?

Copy the following text and complete the table with your IDs:

1st:   ID=20
2nd: ID=20
3rd:  ID=20
4th:  ID=20
5th:  ID=20
6th:  ID=20

And email this to the flex-dev@incubator.apache.org. Every e-mail =
address can only vote once, if someone votes multiple times, the =
previous voting of this user is invalid. Only the last voting of a user =
counts.


EXAMPLE:

1st:   ID 12
2nd: ID 19
3rd:  ID 3
4th:  ID 6
5th:  ID 9
6th:  ID 17

And I would make a little Excel table for counting the points.

Marcus

Am 16.01.2012 um 20:57 schrieb Peter Elst:

>> Once the logo has been voted for and chosen, wouldn't it be wise to =
have a
>> round on fine-tuning?
>=20
>=20
> yes good point, that is planned:
>=20
> "The design as accepted by popular vote will be treated as a proposal =
that
> can be tweaked and cemented into it's final published form."
>=20
> There's been discussion on the voting procedure, and I'm sure there =
will be
> a follow up email to the list explaining how it will work.
>=20
> - Peter