Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 964FF9B5A for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6630 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2012 03:26:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6371 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2012 03:25:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6348 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2012 03:25:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:25:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.160.175] (HELO mail-gy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.160.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:25:38 +0000 Received: by ghbg19 with SMTP id g19so20893ghb.6 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:25:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.180.40 with SMTP id i28mr299848yhm.121.1327548317952; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:25:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (124-149-173-100.dyn.iinet.net.au. [124.149.173.100]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n17sm2514264anl.14.2012.01.25.19.25.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:25:17 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Subject: Re: Codename for the new version? From: Justin Mclean In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:25:11 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <927E3B79-96E1-46D5-B266-658D7B365CEE@classsoftware.com> References: <4B74E9B3-F5A2-4E5E-A3CD-44710E705C76@classsoftware.com> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Jonathan, > You could always work with a committer and push up your idea. Sure but would it then go under the committers name not yours? And you = have to go through them for every check in or change. Not that I think = it's a big issue I've just seen a few people on the list suggest/imply = that anyone can place code on the whiteboard area when it's not quite as = straight forward as that. > Ultimately the idea of a "codename" goes back to the idea of a = "roadmap"; and this has been discussed before on the list. True "codenames" fit in more with the traditional project/release cycle. = But as we don't know what the next version of Apache Flex is going to be = (4.7 or perhaps 4.8 seem likely) perhaps coming up with a code name for = is is a good idea. How about picking a name of an old arcade game? = There's a wide range of names and it has geek appeal. Ah looking at the couple of responses that just come in I guess there's = a clear consensus on it and that's a no to code names. :-) Thanks, Justin=