Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of masuland@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender)
From: Sebastian Mohr <masuland@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-19-161678580
Subject: Re: What about Cairngorm 3?
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:40:29 +0100
In-Reply-To: <64a323d8$7a6079$1b70af7e$@com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
References: <64a323d8$7a6079$1b70af7e$@com>
Message-Id: <7CC09902-BB37-4A36-8225-A73620AAADE5@gmail.com>

--Apple-Mail-19-161678580
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

@Rui 

Great that you've asked. I intended to cover this 
topic today ;) The situation can be boiled down 
to this question:

Will Apache Flex only be responsible for managing 
the Flex SDK or will Apache Flex also be responsible 
to define "Best Coding Practices" to build sustainable 
Flex apps?

Some guys on this list seem to dislike that Apache Flex
should be responsible to define "Best Coding Practices"
for Flex, which IMHO I think is wrong.

When this debate has been clarified we will see if the 
"Best Coding Practices" discussions have to move to 
another mailing list, or not.


-- Sebastian


On Jan 12, 2012, at 10:02 AM, Rui Silva wrote:

> I've been seeing some discussions around best practices for Flex 
> application development which led me to think about Cairngorm 3 which was 
> large that: Some architectural best practices and supporting code 
> libraries. Cairngorm is currently hosted on Sourceforge 
> (http://sourceforge.net/adobe/cairngorm/home/Home/).
> 
> Could this be a starting point?
> 
> Cheers,
> Rui
> 


--Apple-Mail-19-161678580--