Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C5959611 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75134 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2012 08:47:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74487 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2012 08:47:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 74459 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2012 08:47:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:47:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.109.204.196] (HELO c00l.c00l.nl) (194.109.204.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:47:08 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.10] (h155145.upc-h.chello.nl [62.194.155.145]) by c00l.c00l.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 246831A7C95 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:46:48 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Advice for Logo Contest Round 2 From: Arnoud Bos In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:46:47 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5490E13E-5129-46F5-8ED8-75855E00F863@artim-interactive.nl> References: To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hmmm=20 I wonder how you explained the future of flex to your top marketeers = 'who laughed their head off' Cause one of their preferred logo's looks like a styled infinity sign = (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0780536/).=20 I'm sure we all agree here that even if we reinvent flex, it still won't = last forever.=20 Thinking that would be a little naive imho :-) So far for the correct message that reflects the future of flex clearly = ;-) Ah well... On 24-01-2012, at 08:10, kitashima tomo wrote: > Dear All, >=20 > It nice to see the 3 Apache Flex logo are shorlisted for the final = round. > Seems like some of my good friends do not find it acceptable (my = friends > are the marketer > working in the top 500 companies). They laughed their head off at = PPMC's > and voters' poor taste for nominate bad design logos. One of my friend > even made a > sarcastic remark of the Flex community are heading for a *sinking* = since > brand image are very important and do reflect how the customers' view > the community. >=20 > To confirm my doubt, I have contact some of the logo designers, they = agree > the top 3 logos hold no distinctive and meaningless except #12 and #50 = seem > to > reflect the future of Apache Flex clearly. It may be *advisable* for = the > community to reconsider the contest. I wish to disclaimer that I'm not > speaking up for anyone. >=20 > Please ignore my advice if you find my message is of no importance. I = wish > the community good luck then. >=20 > Lastly, I wish everyone a Happy Chinese New Year 2012. >=20 > rgds, > Kitashima Tomo Met vriendelijke groet, Arnoud Bos Artim interactive T +31 6 246 40 216 E arnoud@artim-interactive.nl