Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3067198C6 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70936 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 13:38:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70870 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 13:38:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70716 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2012 13:38:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:38:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [212.27.42.5] (HELO smtp5-g21.free.fr) (212.27.42.5) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:37:53 +0000 Received: from KORODESKTOP (unknown [82.245.153.108]) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id A8372D4816E for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:37:28 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <53B8A7D1FFEC4F76A3584F730147ED69@KORODESKTOP> From: "Dimitri k." To: References: <373d2df9$4c494033$2f247720$@com> Subject: Re: First Flex release as soon as possible? (was: So, what should we do first?) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:36:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org From: "Bertrand Delacretaz" > As far as the Incubator is concerned, a release doesn't exist if it's > not public. > So if the first Apache Flex release is not interesting to users, we > should just label it as such, but it will still be public. > Creating it will IMO be a very useful exercise for this podling, and > it will be an important milestone towards graduating Flex. Valid points. Maybe it was more the talk about 3.5 Apache release that made me worried we waste some steam on things nobody would use. If the point is to have the podling practice an Apache release, and if this is labeled as such, I withdraw the doubts I've emitted earlier. +1 for a "practice" 4.6 Apache Flex release