Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
From: "Rui Silva" <flex@rduartes.net>
To: <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Logo contest
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:19:18 -0800
Reply-To: flex@rduartes.net
Message-ID: <2b1d5b82$561b1e1e$48dc5fe5$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


-------- Original Message --------
> From: "Dave Fisher" <dave2wave@comcast.net>
>
> Agreed. If someone submitted two proposals those are separate. If both 
proposals make it to a second round. We could certainly give the submitter 
the chance to withdraw one. I happen to like a few of these and that will 
make my vote more difficult. :-)
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 

In general I would agree with this solution. My only fear is that Denis 
didn't intend to submit them as separate entries but just variations or an 
update to the previous submission. It would be a damn shame if that would 
hurt the logo's chance of being selected, because it is pretty good, but I 
agree that we cannot just simply open an exception for this.  

@Jonathan
If you look at them you'll understand why Greg brought this up. The second 
submission is just some experiments around color variations from the first. 


Rui