Return-Path: 
 <flex-dev-return-253-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 670979360
	for <apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Thu,  5 Jan 2012 09:37:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 65552 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 09:37:28 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64585 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 09:37:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:flex-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <flex-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 64522 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2012 09:37:04 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:37:04 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [212.27.42.5] (HELO smtp5-g21.free.fr) (212.27.42.5)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 09:36:55 +0000
Received: from KORODESKTOP (unknown [82.245.153.108])
	by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id D705CD4827A
	for <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>; Thu,  5 Jan 2012 10:36:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <299C41ECAE4C41E8926B798D0C9B6FB8@KORODESKTOP>
From: "DiMiTRi" <koro@noos.fr>
To: <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
References: 
 <CB2A0EEA.390F6%aharui@adobe.com><10112CBCEF3F4C68BA8DCE2F37A2F8DA@KORODESKTOP>
 <CAAgciqpxPTrWMMH1OV+w9eSHTEv05ej8XaZ1Oqp=SS1b6Mu1Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Flex Framework rsl's
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:36:05 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

From: "Roland Zwaga" <roland@stackandheap.com>
> I'm pretty sure that will never happen, Adobe will never sign something
> that they're not responsible for.
> If Apache releases an SDK with a glaring security hole in it somewhere,
> Adobe will take the fall.
> Sorry for being pessimistic, but I don't see it happening. But I'll be 
> glad
> to be proven wrong :)
>

I was thinking maybe the other way around: Flash Player accepting Apache 
signed RSLs...