Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <20120116112024.15905ak3302mrtxk@www.teotigraphix.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:20:24 -0500
From: Michael Schmalle <mike@teotigraphix.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Logo Contest]
References: 
 <CAAd0WraZ4RauAjqyDSk+muOSYL7UdD9mrDvq_Rs-=6pEm9EUag@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAd0WraZ4RauAjqyDSk+muOSYL7UdD9mrDvq_Rs-=6pEm9EUag@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=ISO-8859-1;
 DelSp="Yes";
 format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.9)

Sounds like a good idea.

I have been doing my best to keep the information accurate anyway.

I am also keeping a local list of entrants and their emails for each  
submission if you want that when the contest ends.

Mike

Quoting Jonathan Campos <jonbcampos@gmail.com>:

> As we are getting to the end of the logo contest I would like to add on
> thing, and I want others opinion on this.
>
> After we close submissions I would like to have a 48 hour hold prior to any
> voting. During this time I would be happy to do the legwork and ensure that
> each eligible submission is not associated with the submitter's company or
> identity. Obviously any help would be appreciated.
>
> I know it sounds paranoid, but without this due diligence we may vote for a
> really cool submission that is directly in line with a company,
> possibly alluding to some connection between Flex and a specific company. I
> feel that these submissions should be excluded from voting as they could
> lead to some sort of odd association between a specific company and Flex -
> and I don't think that is the intention to this project. Obviously this is
> one of the many reasons we aren't using the Adobe logo or logo influence.
>
> --
> Jonathan Campos
>