Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 david@davidarno.org does not designate 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
From: "David Arno" <david@davidarno.org>
To: <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: State of the Project
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:00:35 -0000
Message-ID: <14e201ccd9c6$9f7552c0$de5ff840$@davidarno.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Thread-Index: AczZxpk8LowwJzsoSkuGXULZ1Etdfw==
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-gb

> From: Giorgio Natili [mailto:g.natili@gnstudio.com] 
> Sent: 23 January 2012 11:44

>>There is a difficult line to walk between the bad PR of a too-early 
>>release and the community losing interest if it takes too long. Again 
>>it would be useful to try and reach a consensus on this. Maybe it's 
>>time for some [vote] threads?
>
> I agree but the same sentence works without pointing again the finger
against the 
> PR, let's try to consider past as past and let's try to move on.

I have expressed myself badly I think. I wasn't pointing fingers. It is
Apache Flex that risks the bad PR if 4.7 is released too early.

David.