Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B4B9B840 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:16:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63543 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2012 18:16:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63490 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2012 18:16:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 63482 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2012 18:16:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:16:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=FRT_ADOBE2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gosmith@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.27] (HELO exprod6og111.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:16:19 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob111.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTxcMXcbQ/AaoY0VyFPMjA649IuSAbhz+@postini.com; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:15:59 PST Received: from inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-4b [10.128.4.237]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q0IIFu2U004672; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:15:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from nacas02.corp.adobe.com (nacas02.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.100]) by inner-relay-4.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id q0IIFtPl021682; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:15:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from nambx05.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.124]) by nacas02.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.100]) with mapi; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:15:55 -0800 From: Gordon Smith To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" , "peter.elst@gmail.com" , "rajubitter@gmail.com" Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:15:53 -0800 Subject: RE: Falcon compiler source code / Falcon architecture Thread-Topic: Falcon compiler source code / Falcon architecture Thread-Index: AczVd8MjxKaJKYJeTqCP8igc/8TODAAAZJ+AAACILRcAJGfzEA== Message-ID: <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419ADD45A322@nambx05.corp.adobe.com> References: <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419ADD45A21A@nambx05.corp.adobe.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 > given the amount of work required to get Flex going as a project, I have = to say it would be much less work to donate it [Falcon] within the Flex pro= ject=20 Good point! - Gordon Smith, Adobe -----Original Message----- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 4:53 PM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; peter.elst@gmail.com; rajubitter@gmail.c= om Subject: Re: Falcon compiler source code / Falcon architecture On 1/17/12 4:38 PM, "Gordon Smith" wrote: > Falcon can compile pure-AS apps that aren't built with the Flex=20 > framework so I don't think it makes sense as a subproject of Flex. >=20 > - Gordon Smith, Adobe If Falcon is going to have a distinct community then yes, it should have it= s own project, but given the amount of work required to get Flex going as a= project, I have to say it would be much less work to donate it within the = Flex project. However, I plan to worry more about that in April or May. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui