Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 david@davidarno.org does not designate 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender)
From: "David Arno" <david@davidarno.org>
To: <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
References: <373d2df9$4c494033$2f247720$@com>
 <CAD0VuCJ3boqTKE4FtHB9MeLDF-9b39HhB9pMM9KLG-K=fuAkfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAD0VuCJ3boqTKE4FtHB9MeLDF-9b39HhB9pMM9KLG-K=fuAkfA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: RE: First Flex release as soon as possible? (was: So,
 what should we do first?)
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 12:52:03 -0000
Message-ID: <000601cccba8$d30869f0$79193dd0$@davidarno.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Index: AQHtM0UVgNtUq6RCAaBefspvys3s+gGyXT54la9XjHA=
Content-Language: en-gb

> From: Iwo Bana=B6 [mailto:banas.iwo@gmail.com]=20
> Sent: 05 January 2012 11:59
>> I would go as far as to suggest that the first Apache Flex release=20
>> should equivalent in code to the current Adobe Flex 4.6 release.
>=20
> We can even keep the version as Apache Flex 4.6 to avoid the =
impression
that we are releasing some new features.

I completely agree with this. Also it would be good to do this with =
Apache
Flex 3.6 too for those of us who still need to use Flex 3.

David.