incubator-flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jude <flexcapaci...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Apache Flex suggestion - dumping SWF support in favor of HTML5 - listen to Steve
Date Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:50:24 GMT
These are just off the top of my head.

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:49 AM, jude <flexcapacitor@gmail.com> wrote:

> Someone needs to create a FAQ that points to these discussions.
>
> 1) Will the next version of Flex output to HTML5
> Probably not.
>
> Current roadblocks:
> • HTML5 does not support the full API used by Flex. Solutions suggested
> include creating an alternative version of the SDK without them.
> • Roadblock 2
> • Roadblock 3 (added as they come up)
>
> Conclusion:
> It is under investigation and will be pursued after Falcon / FalconJS
> compiler is committed to the repository. Limitations will have to be
> explored and listed. Discussions [1] [2]
>
> 2) What's going to be in the next version of Flex?
> People are working on component parity of Spark components to mx
> components, optimizing base classes like UIComponent, removing
> dependencies, etc (add yours here). What actually is in the next release is
> ultimately based on... Discussions [1]
>
>
> 3) How do I submit a patch?
> ...
>
> 4) How do I submit a component?
> ...
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:16 AM, James Roland Cabresos <
> j.cabresos@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Good to know! Was the discussion of that approach available here?
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: James Roland Cabresos [mailto:j.cabresos@gmail.com]
>> > > Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2012 4:16 PM
>> > > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org; flex@rduartes.net
>> > > Subject: Re: Apache Flex suggestion - dumping SWF support in favor of
>> > > HTML5 - listen to Steve
>> > >
>> > > Just a suggestion, If the current Flex version can't be entirely
>> ported
>> > > or
>> > > be made compatible to FalconJS or any other AS3 to JS compiler because
>> > > of
>> > > the limitations, perhaps we could just create a separate version of
>> > > Flex
>> > > where it is optimized for these compilers.
>> > Such an approach has already been discussed.
>> >
>> > > This way we may have
>> > > something
>> > > that is working in less than 6 months I guess.
>> > I think it will much longer than 6 months.
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message